War and its leaders, can we compare it with the game of chess? - war chess game
The war was by the leaders of the "adopted policy" against the leaders of the countries are in conflict.
Would it be easier to kill the leaders, so that the war will be faster.
Civilians and soldiers who are not even a hand in creating wars always the victims, but the bosses are sitting in comfortable rooms, away from danger.
Like chess, where the king and his checkmated and the game is over. Why kill peons?
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
War Chess Game War And Its Leaders, Can We Compare It With The Game Of Chess?
1 comment:
Yes, you can compare the game of chess, but in chess, the loser has to play again, good or bad.
Kill N leaders, is stupid. Much more than a step forward and take the job.
The soldiers are a tool for implementing the policy. Where it is sticky, if leadership is stupid enough to allow citizens to make informed policy and military strategy. In modern war, that people are much less than in the past. In the case of Iraq, most of the killing is now done by the radical Islamic Crazy. Most of them are killing innocents. Also, the problem can not be done so that the experts presented their work.
This was tried in the past, with disastrous results. As mentioned above, a pop.
Post a Comment